Evaluating Perceived Safety and Comfort in Urban Civic Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/tarce-2022.11.1.3232Keywords:
Urban, Perceived Safety, Comfort, Framework, PublicAbstract
The urban public spaces play a vital role in the enhancement of quality of life of the urbanites. Recent studies explicitly demonstrate the fact that these limited spaces in the urban context directly impact on the physical, social, and psychological health of its users. But some of these spaces are often underused or neglected as a result of perceived danger and risk implicit by the arrangement of elements. This is common in many designed urban public spaces. This study focuses on three types of urban civic spaces as squares, plazas and forecourts which are vital on sustainable development of urban communities.Accordingly, this research intends to develop a framework to assess perceived safety and comfort in urban civic spaces. The process (literature) identified seven main attributes namely visual qualities, spatial configuration, pleasurability, inclusiveness, convenience, activities, and imageability. The 54 sub-attributes ascertained under the main attributes were scored through observations and direct user ratings. Expert weightages and significance scores obtained through the process finalizes an equation to calculate the final perceived safety and comfort levels of the urban civic spaces. Validation of this framework in the context of Sri Lanka depicted that Arcade Independence Square (Square) is more psychologically safer and comfortable for the users, followed by Echelon square (plaza)and Fort station forecourt (forecourt). The final scores produced by the developed framework reflects the current condition of the civic space elaborating the demands for improvements. The proper use of this framework will result in convivial, safer, comfortable, and user-friendly urban civic spaces.
References
D. Abrams, J. Christian and D. Gordon, Multidisciplinary Handbook of Social Exclusion Research. John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
J. Appleton, The Experience of Landscape. Wiley, 1975.
H. Arendt, The Human Condition (Second edition). University of Chicago Press, 1998.
T. Banerjee, “The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places,” Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 9-24, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976352.
K. Bansal, “Design Strategies for Reorganizing the Public Realm of a Neighbourhood Unit: The Case of the Modern Housing Complex, Manimajra, Chandigarh,” Creative Space, Vol. 2, pp. 157–182, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15415/cs.2015.22002.
P.K. Baran, P. Tabrizian, Y. Zhai, J. W. Smith, and M.F. Floyd, “An exploratory study of perceived safety in a neighborhood park using immersive virtual environments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,” Vol. 35, pp. 72-81, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ufug.2018.08.009
R.R. Behrens, “Art, Design and Gestalt Theory,” Leonardo, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp.299-303, 1998.
J. Boros, and I. Mahmoud, “Urban Design and the Role of Placemaking in Mainstreaming Nature-Based Solutions, Learning From the Biblioteca Degli Alberi Case Study in Milan,” Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, Vol. 3, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frsc.2021.635610.
J. Burgess, “Place-Making: The Contribution of Environmental Perception Studies in Planning. Geography, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 317-326, 1979.
M. Carmona, T. Heath, T. Oc and S. Tiesdell, Public Places Urban Spaces, Second Edition: The Dimensions of Urban Design (2 edition). Architectural Press, 2010.
V. Ceccato, “Eyes and Apps on the Streets: From Surveillance to Sousveillance Using Smartphones,” Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 44, 2019. 073401681881869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07340168 18818696.
J. Cidell, and D. Lechtenberg, “Developing a Framework for the Spaces and Spatialities of Transportation and Mobilities,” Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Vol. 106, No.2, pp. 257-265, 2016.
J. Coeterier, “Lay people’s evaluation of historic sites,” Landscape and Urban Planning - Landscape Urban Plan, Vol. 59, pp. 111-123, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00007-5.
H. Day, “A Subjective Definition of Complexity,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 583-584, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.2466/pms.1967.25.2.583.
R. Dillon, “Designing urban space for psychological comfort: The Kentish Town Road project,” Journal of Public Mental Health, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.10-20, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/174657292 00500027.
M. Douglass, Civic Spaces in a Global Age: An Agenda for Pacific Asia Cities, 2002.
Y. Elsheshtawy, “Urban Complexity: Toward the Measurement Of The Physical Complexity of Street-Scapes,” Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 301-316,1997.
K. Finstad, Response Interpolation and Scale Sensitivity: Evidence Against 5-Point Scales, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 7, 2010.
C. Hale, “Fear of Crime: A Review of the Literature,” International Review of Victimology, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 79-150, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026975809600400201.
W. Hammitt, E. Backlund, and R. Bixler, “Place Bonding for Recreation Places: Conceptual and Empirical Development,” Leisure Studies - LEIS STUD, Vol. 25, pp. 17-41, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360500098100.
T. Hartig, Restorative Environments. Elsevier. 2017. [Online]. Available: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-333197
K. Hung, and J. L. Crompton, “Benefits and Constraints Associated with the Use of an Urban Park Reported by a Sample of Elderly in Hong Kong,”Leisure Studies, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 291-311, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360500409810.
J. Jacobs, The death and life of great American cities, 1961.
R. Kaplan, and S. Kaplan, The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. CUP Archive. 1989.
L. Kawshalya, and J. Dharmasena, “To See Without Being Seen: Landscape perception and human behaviour in urban parks,” Cities People Places : An International Journal on Urban Environments, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4038/cpp.v4i1.40
L. Kawshalya, U. Weerasinghe, and D. Chandrasekara, “Fear of Crime in Urban Environments: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Literature,”2020 from Innovation to Impact (FITI), Vol. 1, pp. 1-6, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/FITI52050.2020.9424901.
S. R. Kellert, and E. O. Wilson, The Biophilia Hypothesis, Island Press, 1993.
Y. Kim, “Exploration of Connectivity between urban plaza and mixed use buildigs,” Masters Theses, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7275/70 48514.
L.R. Larson, V. Jennings, and S.A. Cloutier, “Public Parks and Wellbeing in Urban Areas of the United States.”Plos One, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2016. e0153211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0153211.
X. Lehto, “Assessing the Perceived Restorative Qualities of Vacation Destinations,” Journal of Travel Research, Vol. 52, 325-339, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287512461567
L. H. Lofland, The Public Realm: Exploring the City’s Quintessential Social Territory. “Transaction Pub,” 1998.
K. Lynch, The Image of the City. MIT Press. 1960.
J. Maas, P. Spreeuwenberg, M. Winsum-Westra, R. Verheij, S. de Vries, and P. Groenewegen, “Is green space in the living environment associated with people’s feelings of social safety? Environment and Planning A, Vol. 41, pp. 1763-1777, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1068/a4196.
C. A. Mace, “Psychology and Aesthetics,” The British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 3-16, 1962. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1093/bjaesthetics/2.1.3.
B. K. L. Mak, and C. Y. Jim, “Examining fear-evoking factors in urban parks in Hong Kong,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 171, pp. 42-56, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2017.11.012.
A. H. Maslow, Motivation and personality, pp. 14, 411. Harpers. 1954.
M. P. Mattson, “Superior pattern processing is the essence of the evolved human brain,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 8, 2014. [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/ fnins.2014.00265.
V. Mehta, “Evaluating Public Space. Journal of Urban Design,” Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 53-88, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809. 2013.854698.
M. Z. Memluk, Designing Urban Squares, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.5772/55826.
H. Muderrisoglu, and Z. Demir, “The Relationship between Perceived Beauty and Safety in Urban Recreation Parks,” Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. 4, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas. 2004.72.77.
J. L. Nasar, “New Developments in Aesthetics for Urban Design. In G. T. Moore & R. W. Marans (Eds.), Toward the Integration of Theory, Methods, Research, and Utilization (pp. 149–193). Springer US. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4425-5_5.
A. Ode, C. M. Hagerhall, and N. Sang, “Analysing Visual Landscape Complexity: Theory and Application,” Landscape Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 111–131, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/014263909 03414935.
R. Oldenburg, “The Great Good Place: Cafés, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and how They Get You Through the Day,” Paragon House. 1989.
S. E. Palmer, K. B. Schloss, and J. Sammartino, Visual “Aesthetics and Human Preference,” Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 77-107, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504.
J. D. Porteous, Environmental Aesthetics: Ideas, Politics and Planning. Psychology Press. 1996.
R. Prieto Curiel, and S. Bishop, “Modelling the fear of crime,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 473, No.2203, 20170156, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2017.0156.
P. Ramanujam, Prospect-refuge theory revisited: A search for safety in dynamic public spaces with a reference to design. 2007.
C. Roggeband, and A. Krizsan, “The Selective Closure of Civic Space,” Global Policy, Vol. 12, pp. 23-33, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1111/1758-5899.12973.
A. Stamps, “Mystery, complexity, legibility and coherence: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 1-16. 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00023-9.
R. C. Stedman, “Toward a Social Psychology of Place: Predicting Behavior from Place-Based Cognitions, Attitude, and Identity,” Environment and Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp.561-581, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502034005001.
E. Sundilson, Kevin Lynch, City Elements Create Images in Our Mind, 1960,” CSISS Classics. 2002. [Online]. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9xh963vb.
J. F. Talbot, and R. Kaplan, “Needs and fears: The response to trees and nature in the inner city [Urban forestry, Detroit, Michigan],”Journal of Arboriculture, 1984.
D. Thomas, Architecture and the Urban Environment: A Vision for the New Age (1st edition), Architectural Press, 2002.
A. M. Weber, and J. Trojan, “The Restorative Value of the Urban Environment: A Systematic Review of the Existing Literature,” Environmental Health Insights, Vol. 12, 2018. 1178630218812805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1178630218812805.
W. H. Whyte, The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces (8th ed. edition). Project for Public Spaces, 1980.
M. Yokohari, M. Amemiya, and M. Amati, “The history and future directions of greenways in Japanese New Towns,” Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 76, No.1, pp. 210-222, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.09.033.
K. Zakariya, N. Z. Harun, and M. Mansor, “Spatial Characteristics of Urban Square and Sociability: A Review of the City Square, Melbourne,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 153, pp. 678-688, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.099
L. Zeng, J. Lu, W. Li, and Y. Li, “A fast approach for large-scale Sky View Factor estimation using street view images,” Building and Environment, Vol. 135, pp. 74-84, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
