Economic Valuation on Conservation of Rainforest in Eastern Sinharaja, Sri Lanka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/tarce-2022.11.1.3342Keywords:
Rainforest, Contingent Valuation Method, Willingness to Pay, Non-Use Values, Rainforest ConservationAbstract
The value for goods and services is noticeable as the price is paid for those goods and services, but in environmental goods and services the real price or value is misrepresent in ordinary markets. Especially the forest benefits or non-market values are not normally exchange in markets and generally ignored in decision making. Benefits obtained from environmental elements cannot be estimated and it causes for the continuous damages which can be reason for long term worldwide effects. Therefore such values and damages need to be justified at least by ensuring that they can be identified and conserved for future generations. But conserving forest features, improving or managing is costly. Eastern Sinharaja – Sri Lanka is a world heritage rainforest which represented with valuable resources for all living beings. However, the resources in Eastern Sinharaja is under continuous degradation and requires conservation measures. The research problem focuses on what is the economic value on conservation of Eastern Sinharaja rainforest environment. This research is attempt to estimate the total value of conservation of Eastern Sinharaja rainforest environment using Contingent Valuation method (CVM). The information was gathered from a questionnaire survey under random sampling method using 234 of sample size. The results has discovered, respectively socio economic variables, general environmental attitudes and willingness to pay sections designed have identified as key sections which derived the main features which are affecting to the economic value of the conservation of the rainforest environment. Gender, employment, voter, income are socio economic features which affect to the economic value. In general environment attitudes for willingness to pay (WTP) and the respondents attitudes are positive when consider about the significance values of the features for Mean WTP of Rs. 257.30 from a household. This study indicated that despite Sri Lanka is a developing country, people are willing to contribute for conservation of the resource. Those derived values may significantly contribute in conservation of rainforest environment and deliver materials to design applicable policies for future rainforest environment management.
References
W. N. Adger, K. Brown, R. Cervigni and D. Moran, “Total economic value of forests in Mexico,” Springer, Vol. 12, 2014.
M. D. Authority, “Environmental assets and ecosystem functions,” Australia: MDBA publication, 2018 .
M. M.Bahir and T. D. Surasinghe, “A conservation assessment of the Sri Lankan Agamidae,” The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Vol. 10, 2005.
Z. Burivalova, T. F. Allnutt, D. Rademacher, A. Schlemm, D. S. Wilcove and R. A. Butler, “What works in tropical forest conservation, and what does not: Effectiveness of four strategies in terms of environmental, social and economic outcomes,” Conservation science and practice, Vol. 15, 2019.
L. M. Brander and M. J. Koetse, “The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of Contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results,” Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 92, No. 10, pp. 2763-2773, 2011.
M. Christie, N. Hanley, J. Warren, K. Murphy, R. Wright and T. Hyde, “Valuing the diversity of biodiversity,” Ecological Economics, Vol. 58, No. 2, pp. 304-317, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.07.034
R. T. Corlett and R. B. Primack, “Tropical Rainforest Conservation a global perspective,” In Tropical Rain Forests: An Ecological and Bio-geographical Comparison, pp. 17, 2008.
R. Cornes and T. Sandler, “The Theory of Externalities, PublicGoods, and Club Goods,” Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Direct methods for valuation of environmental goods, Lecture onenvironmental economics, 2004, May 7.
D. Pearce, “An Intellectual History of Environmental Economics,” Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, Vol. 27, 2002.
P.Elias and C. M. Tobin, “Tropical Forest Regions,” In UCS, The root of the problem, pp. 12. USA: UCS, 2011.
E. A. ERD, “Estimation of Willingness to Pay,” Introductory Courseon Economic Analysis of Investment projects, 2013.
G. W. Flatley and J. W. Bennell, “Using Contingent Valuation toDetermine Australian Tourists Values for Forest Conservation inVanuatu,” In Economic Analysis and Policy, pp. 113. Canberra, 1996.
C.A. Fisher, “The Conceptual Underpinning of the ContingentValuation Method,” In D.J. Bjornstad and J.R. Khan, eds., Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources. Cheltenham, London:Edward Edgar, 1996.
M.W. Fonta, H. E. Ichoku and J. K. Mariara, “The Effect of ProtestZero on Estimates of Willingness to Pay in Healthcare Contingent Valuation Analysis,” Forthcoming in Applied Health Economics andHealth Policy, 2009.
N. E. Flores, and R. T. Carson, “The Relationship between theIncome Elasticities of Demand and Willingness to Pay,” Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego, 24, 1995.
J. M. Gibson, D. Rigby, D. A. Polya, and N. Russell, “Discrete Choice Experiments in Developing Countries: Willingness to Payversus Willingness to Work,” Springer link, Vol. 25, 2015.
N. Hanley and J. Knight, “Valuing the environment: recent UKexperience and an application to Green Belt Land,” Journal ofEnvironmental Planning and Management, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 145-160, 1992.
J. Hicks, “Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Heckman”, J. J. 1979, “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, Vol. 47, pp. 153-63, 1939.
R. A. Kramer, E. Mercer and N. Sharma, “Valuing TropicalRainforest Protection Using the Contingent Valuation Method,” In Forestry, Economics and Environment, pp. 14 , 1992.
H. M. Gunathilaka. Environmental Valuation: Theory andApplications, Kandy: Postgraduate Institute of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, 2003.
L. Madureira, L. C. Nunesb, J. G. Borgesc and A. O. Falcãod, “Assessing forest management strategies using a contingent valuationapproach and advanced visualization techniques: A Portuguese casestudy,” Elsvier, Vol. 16, 2011.
M. Meegaskubura, “Morning side Threatened,” The island e-paper, Features, October 4, 2011.
R. F. Norway. State of the rainforest, “Norway: Rainforest Foundation Norway and GRID”, 2014.
A. Parajuli, “Application of Contingent Valuation Method in NaturalResource Management in Nepal,” Reaserchgate, Vol. 17, 2016.
I. Paek, “Three Statistical Testing Procedures in Logistic Regression:Their Performance in Differential Item Functioning (DIF)Investigation,” New Jercy: ETS, 2009.
K. A. Rahim, “Contingent Valuation Method (CVM),” Economic Valuation of the Goods and Services of Coastal Habitats. SamutSongkram Province, thailand, March 24-28, 2008.
M. Rodrigo, “Now Sinharaja under road threat”, Sunday Times, Features 2011 July 31. [Online]. Available: (http://www.sundaytimes.lk/110731/News/nws_17.html), 2011.
C. Rupérez-Moreno, J. Pérez-Sánchez, J. Senent-Aparicio and M. d.Flores-Asenjo, “The economic value of conjoint local management in water resources : Results from a contingent valuation in the Boquerón aquifer (Albacete, SE Spain),” Elsvier, Vol. 10, 2015.
S. T. SEEA, “Accounting for environmental assets,” Microsoft PowerPoint - Malaysia Sep2013 Asset accounting.pptx. Kuala lampur, Malayasia: SIAP Training Course on SEEA, September 23-27, 2013.
V.K. Smith, C. Poulos and H. Kim, “Treating open space as an urbanamenity,” Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 107-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-7655(01)00055-0, 2002.
J. Schwarz and H. B. Enzler, “Applied Data Analysis (with SPSS),” Lucern University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 2014.
M. Tranmer and M. Elliot, “Binary Logistic Regression,” Cathie Marsh Center for Census and Survey Research, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
