Participation of Construction Professionals in the Environmental Impact Assessment of Heavy Engineering Projects

Authors

  • Temidayo Olanrewaju Aduloju Department of Quantity Surveying, Lagos State University, Lagos State, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/tarce-2023.12.2.4117

Keywords:

Stakeholders, EIA Participation, Heavy Engineering Projects

Abstract

Synergy and collaboration among various experts and stakeholders, including construction professionals, play a crucial role in reducing the negative environmental impacts of heavy engineering projects. While the heavy engineering industry significantly contributes to national economies, it also poses a threat to the environment through air, land, and water pollution. Therefore, the influence of multidisciplinary experts should be prioritized. However, there are significant challenges to be addressed in this regard, particularly concerning construction professionals. Hence, this paper extensively discusses the stakeholders involved in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of heavy engineering projects and their participation. A well-structured questionnaire was distributed to construction professionals in the study area, including architects, builders, engineers, estate surveyors, quantity surveyors, and urban and regional planners. Convenience sampling techniques were used to select these professionals. Additionally, six heavy engineering projects were purposively selected as case studies. Descriptive and inferential statistics were employed to analyze the retrieved data. The study concluded that architects, urban and regional planners, engineers, and quantity surveyors are the construction professionals most commonly involved in the EIA of heavy engineering projects. However, their level of involvement was found to be low. This study is crucial at a time when construction professionals are expanding their horizons beyond building projects alone to align with global trends. It is essential for construction professionals, government agencies, professional bodies, and private organizations to prioritize the outcomes of this study by promoting increased participation and improving awareness and knowledge among construction stakeholders regarding their roles and required skills for effective participation. This could lead to job creation, diversification, and improved environmental impacts of heavy engineering projects, particularly in developing countries. Given the global experience of climate change, multidisciplinary involvement and synergy between different experts and stakeholders in heavy engineering projects are vital for mitigating negative environmental impacts on air, land, and water. Addressing this issue will not only enhance the inclusivity of construction professionals in the journey to achieving Net-zero emissions but also ensure the effectiveness of heavy engineering projects, especially in the global south. While the findings of this research are valuable, there are limitations due to the lack of access to qualitative information from some intended interview respondents. Despite these limitations, the study identifies a knowledge gap that can be explored in developing countries, particularly in Africa, to improve the participation of construction experts in the EIA of heavy engineering projects. The study adopts an empirical approach to map out research focus on environmental sustainability for construction professionals in the heavy engineering industry - an aspect of sustainable development that has not received considerable attention in recent studies on sustainability.

References

A. O. Abosede, A. Opawole, B. Olubola, G. K. Ojo, and K. Kajimo-Shakantu, “Performance analysis of small and medium-sized construction firms in Oyo State, Nigeria,” Acta Structilia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 66-96, 2019.

A. Akintoye, “Analysis of factors influencing project cost estimating practice,” Journal of Construction Management and Economics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 77-89, 2000, doi: 10.1080/01446190037.0979.

Aljazeera and News Agency, “At Least Eight Killed in Nigeria Schools' Building Collapse,” Retrieved April 16, 2019, from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/03/children-trapped-nigeria-school-building-collapse-190313134133619.html.

Alzheimer Europe, “Research Methods: Types of Research,” https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/Research/Understanding-dementia-research/Types-of-research/Research-methods, 2009.

I. Anago, “Environmental Impact Assessment as a Tool for Sustainable Development: The Nigerian Experience,” in FIG XXII International Congress, Washington, D.C. USA, pp. 1-13, 2002.

Andale, “Sampling Frame/sample frame definition,” Retrieved March 18, 2019, from http://www.statisticshowto.com/sampling-frame/.

C. I. Anyawu, “The Role of Building Construction Project Team Members in Building Project Delivery,” IQSR Journal of Business and Management, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 30-34, 2013.

N. Asika, Research Methodology in the Behavioural Sciences. Ikeja, Lagos: Longman Nigeria Plc, 1991.

P. J. Barasa, “Environmental Impact Assessment- General Procedures,” in Short Course IX on Exploration for Geothermal Resources, Lake Bogoria and Lake Naivasha, Kenya, 2014.

J. O. Dada and G. O. Jagboro, “Core Skills Requirement and Competencies Expected of Quantity Surveyors: Perspectives from Quantity Surveyors, Allied Professionals and Clients in Nigeria,” Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Build, vol. 12, no. 4, 2012.

G. Duncan, New Aspects of Quantity Surveying Practice. United States of America: Elseiver Publishers Ltd, 2006.

E. Ebunoluwa, “Development of a Framework for Assessing Marketing Relationship Practice of Quantity Surveying Firms in Southwestern Nigeria,” Hezekiah Oluwasanmi Library, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria, 2019.

EIA Act, “Environmental Impact Assessment Act Decree No.86, 1992,” www.Nigerian-law.org, 1992.

EIA Procedural Guidelines, Accessed on 10/08/2021.

O. P. Eneh, “Managing Nigeria's Environment: The Unresolved Issues,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 250-263, 2011.

A. Hussin and A. A. Omran, “Roles of Professionals in Construction,” in The International Conference on Administration and Business ICEA - FAA 2009 14 – 15 NOVEMBER 2009, The Faculty of Business and Administration University of Bucharest, http://conference.faa.ro, 2009.

Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA), “Special IEMA Report on EIA,” Retrieved 28th January, 2022 from iema.net/articles/special-iema-report-on-eia, 2011.

R. B. Khadka and U. S. Shrestha, “Process and Procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment in Some Countries of South Asia,” Environment Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 215-233, 2011.

N. A. Keftin, A. N. Anigbogu, and M. I. Yusufu, “An Assessment of the Compliance of Building Construction Projects with Environmental Impact Assessment Requirements in Nigeria,” FUTY Journal of the Environment, vol. 4, no. 1, 2009.

O. Leonard and S. Anne, “Environmental Impact Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities,” Impact Assessment, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3-30, 1995, doi: 10.1080/07349165.1995.9726076.

B. Lohani, J.W. Evans, H. Ludwig, R.A. Everitt, and S.L. Carpenter, “Environmental Impact Assessment for Developing Countries in Asia,” Asian Development Bank, 1997.

J.F. Molina-Azorin, “Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills,” European Journal of Management and Business Economics, vol. 25, pp. 37-38, 2016.

F. Noorbakhsh and S. Ranjan, “A model for sustainable development: integrating environmental impact assessment and project planning,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, pp. 183-193, 1999.

I. Nwokoro and H. Onukwube, “Sustainable or Green Construction in Lagos, Nigeria: Principles, Attributes and Framework,” Sustainable Development, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 166-174, 2011.

G. K Ojo, “Environmental Impact Assessment in Nigeria: Construction Professionals Inputs,” Lagos Journal of Environmental Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127-142, 2016.

E. Okoko, “Quantitative Techniques in Urban Analysis,” 2001.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “Enterprises by business size,” https://data.oecd.org/entrepreneur/enterprises-by-business-size.htm, Accessed on 03/08/2021.

N. Patrick, “Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks in the Social and Management Sciences,” Retrieved December 28, 2017, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278961764_Theoretical_and_Conceptual_Frameworks_in_the_social_and_Management_Sciences.

Posiva, “Environmental Impact Assessment Procedure,” 2018.

C. Sant and V. Brenda, “The Role of Architects in Sustainable Community Development,” Architectural/Planning Research and Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 107-136, 2009.

S. Simron, “Types of Research Approaches,” School of Planning, Faculty of Environment, EV3-Third Floor University of Waterloo, Canada, 2017.

C. Spratt, R. Walker, and B. Robinson, “Mixed Research Methods,” Practitioner Research and Evaluation Skills Training in Open and Distance Learning, Commonwealth of Learning, 2004.

C. Tahir, “Environmental Impact Assessment and the Urban Planning Crisis in Turkey,” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 165-168, 1999.

UNEP, U. N., “Studies of EIA Practice in Developing Countries,” Technology, Industry and Economics, Economics and Trade branch.

A. Wang, “The Role of Law in Environmental Protection in China: Recent Developments,” Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 195, pp. 194-223, 2007.

C. Wood, “Environmental Impact Assessment in Developing Countries: An Overview,” in New Directions in Impact Assessment for Development: Methods and Practice, Manchester: EIA Centre, School of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester, 2003.

S. Zolfagharian, M. Nourbakhsh, J. Irizarry, A. Ressang, and M. Gheisari, “Environmental Impact Assessment on Construction Sites,” Construction Research Congress, pp. 1750-1759, 2012.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2023

How to Cite

Aduloju, T. O. (2023). Participation of Construction Professionals in the Environmental Impact Assessment of Heavy Engineering Projects. The Asian Review of Civil Engineering, 12(2), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.51983/tarce-2023.12.2.4117