Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Fly Ash in Concrete Mix Design

Authors

  • Sheikh Hayath Mahmud Pundra University of Science & Technology (PUB), Bogura, Bangladesh
  • Md. Maruf Hasan Pundra University of Science & Technology (PUB), Bogura, Bangladesh
  • Liton Chandra Das Pundra University of Science & Technology (PUB), Bogura, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70112/tarce-2024.13.1.4206

Keywords:

Fly Ash, Industrial Wastes, Cementitious Materials, Partial Replacement, Compressive Strength

Abstract

The development of advancements in concrete technology might lessen the amount of natural resources destroyed, thereby reducing the pollutants released into the environment. Currently, industries produce large amounts of fly ash, which adversely affects the environment and human health. Recent studies have shown that additional cementitious materials can improve various concrete qualities. These materials include fly ash, slag, silica fume, metakaolin, rice husk, and hypo sludge. These materials not only enhance the properties of fresh and hardened concrete but also help constructors save money. The aim of this study is to determine whether thermal industrial waste can partially replace cement in concrete manufacturing. Specifically, fly ash was tested as an additional cementitious ingredient to replace conventional concrete. It was added to the cement in different amounts: 0% (fly ash-free), 5%, 10%, and 20% by weight of cement to produce the M-20 mix. Concrete mixtures were created, tested, and their compressive strengths were compared to those of conventional concrete. Results were collected up to 28 days after curing to assess the strength attributes. The use of 5% fly ash results in a decrease in strength, but it is not significant. For 5% replacement of cement, the strength was found to be 2984.57 psi, which is satisfactory.

References

L. C. Das and S. H. Mahmud, “Assessment of Water Pollution in theKorotoa River: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Welfare inBogura, Bangladesh,” TARCE, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 30–34, Dec. 2023.

S. Kotey, Z. Mustapha, B. Boahene Akomah, M. Michael, A.Sampson, and A. Solomon, “Exploring Sawdust as a SustainableAlternative in Block Production: A Study on Compressive Strengthand Environmental Impact,” TARCE, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 16-23, Dec. 2023.

S. Aynharan, M. U. Faris, M. H. F. Afrose Banu, D. S. Joachim, andP. R. Fernando, “Utilization of Waste Plastic in the Way of SyntheticBricks,” TARCE, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–5, Apr. 2023.

N. Anuja and M. Balaji, “A Review on Recycled Aggregate basedThermal Insulated Concrete,” TARCE, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4-7, May2021.

G. Hemanth Kumar and B. Ajitha, “Prediction of CompressiveStrength of Nano Alumina, Micro Alumina & Fly Ash Blended withCement by Using Coefficient of Correlation,” TARCE, vol. 9, no. 2,pp. 8–11, Nov. 2020.

S. Vivek, V. Priya, S. T. Sudharsan, K. Thanukrishna, and R.Vignesh, “Experimental Investigation on Bricks by Using Cow Dung,Rice Husk, Egg Shell Powder as a Partial Replacement for Fly Ash,”TARCE, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1-7, Nov. 2020.

V. Kannan and K. Ganesan, “Mechanical and transport properties internary blended self-compacting concrete with metakaolin and flyash,” IOSRJMCE, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 22-31, Sep.-Oct. 2012.

J. I. Bhatty, J. Gajda, P. E. Botha, and M. M. Bryant, “Utilization ofDiscarded Fly Ash as a Raw Material in the Production of Portlandcement,” Journal of ASTM International, vol. 3, no. 10, 2006.

Downloads

Published

17-03-2024

How to Cite

Mahmud, S. H., Maruf Hasan, M., & Chandra Das, L. (2024). Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Fly Ash in Concrete Mix Design. The Asian Review of Civil Engineering, 13(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.70112/tarce-2024.13.1.4206