Harmonizing Responsibilities: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of Climate Change and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Authors

  • Avesahemad S. N. Husainy Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharad Institute of Technology, College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India
  • Sumit S. Mangave Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharad Institute of Technology, College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India
  • Chetan C. Patil Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharad Institute of Technology, College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India
  • Sudesh D. Mane Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharad Institute of Technology, College of Engineering, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70112/tarce-2024.13.1.4232

Keywords:

SDG, Sustainability, Environment, Challenges, Climate Change

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) must be integrated with social responsibility and climate change initiatives to effectively address global sustainability challenges. Established by the United Nations in 2015, the 17 SDGs aim to tackle a wide range of issues, including poverty, inequality, environmental degradation, and more, all with the ultimate goal of ensuring a sustainable future for everyone. However, climate change poses a significant threat to these goals, particularly concerning issues such as poverty, health, and economic growth. Severe weather events and rising temperatures exacerbate food and water shortages, while also straining public health services. To address these challenges, climate action must incorporate equitable and feasible solutions, with a strong emphasis on social responsibility. In this context, social responsibility involves actions taken by individuals, organizations, and governments that benefit both the environment and society. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) plays a crucial role by encouraging businesses to adopt renewable energy sources, reduce their carbon footprints, and support social justice initiatives. Ultimately, CSR contributes to a sustainable future by enhancing brand perception, attracting talent, fostering innovation, and reducing risks. By integrating these concepts, we can ensure that social inclusion, environmental preservation, and economic growth are pursued simultaneously, promoting a comprehensive approach to global sustainability. This strategy addresses the root causes of social and environmental issues, thereby improving the quality of life for both current and future generations. The SDGs provide a unified language and framework that encourages stakeholder engagement, yet challenges remain in the creation of a functional global governance system.

References

G. Halkos and E. C. Gkampoura, “Where do we stand on the 17Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 70, pp. 94-122, 2021.

N. Ye, T. B. Kueh, L. Hou, Y. Liu, and H. Yu, “A bibliometricanalysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainabledevelopment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 272, p. 122679,2020.

G. Halkos and A. Skouloudis, “Environmental technologydevelopment and diffusion: panel data evidence from 56 countries,” Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, vol. 23, pp. 79-92, 2021.

N. Eisenmenger et al., “The Sustainable Development Goalsprioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a criticalreflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective,”Sustainability Science, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1101-1110, 2020.

B. F. Giannetti, F. Agostinho, J. C. Eras, Z. Yang, and C. M. V. B.Almeida, “Cleaner production for achieving the sustainabledevelopment goals,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 271,pp. 122127, 2020.

M. M. Shourkaei, K. M. Taylor, and B. Dyck, “Examiningsustainable supply chain management via a social‐symbolic worklens: Lessons from Patagonia,” Business Strategy and theEnvironment, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 1477-1496, 2024.

J. E. De Neve and J. D. Sachs, “The SDGs and human well-being: Aglobal analysis of synergies, trade-offs, and regional differences,”Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 15113, 2020.

T. Dietz, R. L. Shwom, and C. T. Whitley, “Climate change andsociety,” Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 46, pp. 135-158, 2020.

M. E. Mondejar et al., “Digitalization to achieve sustainabledevelopment goals: Steps towards a Smart Green Planet,” Science ofThe Total Environment, vol. 794, p. 148539, 2021.

S. L. Pan and S. Zhang, “From fighting COVID-19 pandemic totackling sustainable development goals: An opportunity forresponsible information systems research,” International Journal ofInformation Management, vol. 55, p. 102196, 2020.

P. P. Jose, “A Context Specific Framework for Measurement ofEmpowerment Attained from Poverty Reduction Intervention,” Asian Review of Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. S1, pp. 88-95, 2019.

P. Dauvergne, “Is artificial intelligence greening global supplychains? Exposing the political economy of environmental costs,”Review of International Political Economy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 696-718, 2022.

M. Geissdoerfer, P. Savaget, N. M. Bocken, and E. J. Hultink, “The Circular Economy–A new sustainability paradigm?” Journal ofCleaner Production, vol. 143, pp. 757-768, 2017.

I. Montiel, A. Cuervo-Cazurra, J. Park, R. Antolín-López, and B. W.Husted, “Implementing the United Nations’ sustainable developmentgoals in international business,” Journal of International BusinessStudies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 999-1030, 2021.

D. Zimon, J. Tyan, and R. Sroufe, “Drivers of sustainable supplychain management: Practices to alignment with UN sustainabledevelopment goals,” International Journal for Quality Research,vol. 14, no. 1, 2020.

R. Bali Swain and F. Yang-Wallentin, “Achieving sustainabledevelopment goals: predicaments and strategies,” International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 96-106, 2020.

J. X. Zhan and A. U. Santos-Paulino, “Investing in the SustainableDevelopment Goals: Mobilization, channeling, and impact,” Journal of International Business Policy, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 166-183, 2021.

L. M. Fonseca, J. P. Domingues, and A. M. Dima, “Mapping thesustainable development goals relationships,” Sustainability, vol. 12,no. 8, p. 3359, 2020.

F. Biermann et al., “Scientific evidence on the political impact of theSustainable Development Goals,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 9,pp. 795-800, 2022.

J. D. Sachs et al., “Six transformations to achieve the sustainabledevelopment goals,” Nature Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 805-814, 2019.

J. Gunawan, P. Permatasari, and C. Tilt, “Sustainable developmentgoal disclosures: Do they support responsible consumption andproduction?” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 246, p. 118989,2020.

N. Fallah Shayan, N. Mohabbati-Kalejahi, S. Alavi, and M. A. Zahed,“Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporatesocial responsibility (CSR),” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1222, 2022.

A. H. Rashed and A. Shah, “The role of private sector in theimplementation of sustainable development goals,” Environment,Development and Sustainability, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2931-2948, 2021.

K. Obaideen et al., “The role of wastewater treatment in achievingsustainable development goals (SDGs) and sustainability guideline,” Energy Nexus, vol. 7, p. 100112, 2022.

S. Morton, D. Pencheon, and G. Bickler, “The sustainable development goals provide an important framework for addressingdangerous climate change and achieving wider public healthbenefits,” Public Health, vol. 174, pp. 65-68, 2019.

L. Akenji and M. Bengtsson, “Making sustainable consumption andproduction the core of sustainable development goals,” Sustainability, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 513-529, 2014.

Downloads

Published

16-04-2024

How to Cite

Husainy, A. S. N., Mangave, S. S., Patil, C. C., & Mane, S. D. (2024). Harmonizing Responsibilities: Challenges and Opportunities in the Integration of Climate Change and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The Asian Review of Civil Engineering, 13(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.70112/tarce-2024.13.1.4232